<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging or publishing online? Beware of Plagiarism &#038; copyrights. But what&#8217;s that?</title>
	<link>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/</link>
	<description>Trying to keep pace with this Century</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashutosh</title>
		<link>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3944</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashutosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3944</guid>
		<description>@ Rahi: Perhaps, It will be better if bloggers' below a specified traffic or a specified Google PR are exempted with it and not those bloggers who blog commercially.
When I was writing this post, two of my posts were being completely copied by one of my readers and were published at http://weeklywishingwell.org/2008/10/31/httpthecenturytimescom.aspx &#38; http://weeklywishingwell.org/2008/10/31/.aspx . 
Although a formal syndication request was put to The Century Times (to which I dint reply) &#38; these posts are duly attributed to this blog too; I didn't like the notion of completely copying &#38; using my posts as a whole to comprise not a part but the full post there. No, I am not going to sue Scott for it :) , but I am merely expressing my feelings here. Any counter-views or reactions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rahi: Perhaps, It will be better if bloggers&#8217; below a specified traffic or a specified Google PR are exempted with it and not those bloggers who blog commercially.<br />
When I was writing this post, two of my posts were being completely copied by one of my readers and were published at <a href="http://weeklywishingwell.org/2008/10/31/httpthecenturytimescom.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weeklywishingwell.org/2008/10/31/httpthecenturytimescom.aspx</a> &amp; <a href="http://weeklywishingwell.org/2008/10/31/.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weeklywishingwell.org/2008/10/31/.aspx</a> .<br />
Although a formal syndication request was put to The Century Times (to which I dint reply) &amp; these posts are duly attributed to this blog too; I didn&#8217;t like the notion of completely copying &amp; using my posts as a whole to comprise not a part but the full post there. No, I am not going to sue Scott for it <img src='http://thecenturytimes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> , but I am merely expressing my feelings here. Any counter-views or reactions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahi</title>
		<link>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3904</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3904</guid>
		<description>yes exactly. bloggers shouldn't come under the purview</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes exactly. bloggers shouldn&#8217;t come under the purview</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashutosh</title>
		<link>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3903</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashutosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3903</guid>
		<description>Thanks Priyanka for dropping by and reminding me the name of Pankaj Jain. You have a sharp memory. I have added the scanned picture of the corrigenda which I had skipped yesterday.
And Rahi, I agree that recency is the most important aspect as far as current affairs &#038; news is concerned. So syndication formalities need to be carried in advance for professional news carriers but it should not apply on bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Priyanka for dropping by and reminding me the name of Pankaj Jain. You have a sharp memory. I have added the scanned picture of the corrigenda which I had skipped yesterday.<br />
And Rahi, I agree that recency is the most important aspect as far as current affairs &#038; news is concerned. So syndication formalities need to be carried in advance for professional news carriers but it should not apply on bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahi</title>
		<link>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3899</guid>
		<description>sorry ashutosh but i can help you little on the plagiarism issue. Too many things have been written on the issue and all of them contradicting the others. 

i very much appreciate ur confusion at attributing to news items. One of the important aspects of news is recency. i can't serve my readers stale news by complying to the proper syndication formalities. 

so as long as no one objects, i will keep referring to them. at least my readers value it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry ashutosh but i can help you little on the plagiarism issue. Too many things have been written on the issue and all of them contradicting the others. </p>
<p>i very much appreciate ur confusion at attributing to news items. One of the important aspects of news is recency. i can&#8217;t serve my readers stale news by complying to the proper syndication formalities. </p>
<p>so as long as no one objects, i will keep referring to them. at least my readers value it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twilight Fairy</title>
		<link>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3889</link>
		<dc:creator>Twilight Fairy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecenturytimes.com/2008/10/31/blogging-or-publishing-online-beware-of-plagiarism-copyrights-but-whats-that/#comment-3889</guid>
		<description>hey thanks for writing about this..

that one person who was asked for permission in US, is Pankaj Jain BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey thanks for writing about this..</p>
<p>that one person who was asked for permission in US, is Pankaj Jain BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
